The Entire Expense Should Be Borne by the Federal Government: A 1913 Report from the Commissioners of Accounts

A recent search for reports about immigration in the Municipal Library, showed that the earliest report in the collection was issued by the Office of the Commissioner of Accounts in 1913. Sent to the Honorable Ardolph L. Kline, Mayor, the subject was the treatment of indigent aliens, free of charge, at Bellevue and Allied Hospitals.

Report on Bellevue and Allied Hospitals, Care, Treatment and Maintenance of Indigent Aliens, Free of Charge, 1913. Office of the Mayor (Kline) Collection, NYC Municipal Archives.

The Office of the Commissioner of Accounts (Accounts) was created in 1873 to investigate the City’s operations and financial controls after the Boss Tweed scandals. It evolved into the Department of Investigation and Accounts and today exists as the Department of Investigation. Reviewing files in the Office of the Mayor collections in the Municipal Archives, it would appear that the Commissioners of Accounts covered a lot of territory. In 1913, report topics ranged from the administration of the many courts within the City of New York, to an examination of Police Pension Fund accounts, to an investigation at the request of Mayor William Gaynor and Fire Commissioner Joseph Johnson into firefighters involvement in passing “two platoon” legislation and more.

One document in Mayor Kline’s Departmental Correspondence Received series resonates today: the aforementioned memo regarding the cost of hospital care.

According to the National Archives, more than 20 million immigrants arrived at Ellis Island between 1892 and 1924. Not all stayed in New York City, but many did. Seventy-five percent of New York City residents were immigrants or born to immigrants, the Library of Congress reports. New York was known, then and now, for the diversity of its population. Immigration and industrialization went hand-in-hand and New York’s immigrant residents made the City a manufacturing hub. The new arrivals also faced discrimination and endured harsh living conditions. Federal regulations permitted the deportation of immigrants who might become a public charge.

Report on Bellevue and Allied Hospitals, Care, Treatment and Maintenance of Indigent Aliens, Free of Charge, 1913. Office of the Mayor (Kline) Collection, NYC Municipal Archives.

In 1913, there were three public hospital systems in the City. One operated by the Department of Public Charities oversaw operations at ten hospitals. The Health Department had oversight of six hospitals. The third, the Bellevue and Allied Hospitals, consisted of five institutions: Bellevue Hospital, Harlem Hospital, Gouverneur Hospital, Fordham Hospital and Emergency Hospital. A lengthy December 26, 1913 report from Accounts described this system as “archaic and ineconomical,”(sic) leading to “conflict of authority.” It reported horrific patient treatment, unsanitary conditions, and lax practices. The final sentence in the report comes under the heading Free Treatment of Aliens. “A report (file NO1852) upon the free treatment of aliens, and its very large cost to the city was submitted to the mayor under date of September 25, 1913.”

The Accounts report stated that 57,422 persons were treated at the Bellevue and Allied hospitals. A sampling of the 11,224 records of cases treated in a three-month period showed that “671 were less than three years in this country, and consequently were not citizens.” In the margin of the report is a handwritten calculation in pencil showing that the percent of noncitizens was 6% of those treated. We expect this was calculated by Mayor Kline. Further down, the Accounts report stated that using the percent derived from their sampling, “approximately 9,879 aliens, not citizens of this country, were treated without charge.” The average cost of treatment of each patient during these three years was $21.10, and on this basis the total cost of the aliens treated during the three years therefore amounted to $208,446.90. An inflation calculator shows this would be $6,464,510. in 2023 dollars.

Report, page 2. Office of the Mayor (Kline) Collection, NYC Municipal Archives.

Report, page 3. Office of the Mayor (Kline) Collection, NYC Municipal Archives.

The author took pains to note that the calculations were for people residing in the U.S. for less than three years and stated, “The inclusion of aliens of more than three years’ residence, who have been treated free of charge in these institutions, would considerably augment this sum... The imposition of this burden upon the municipal government it is contended is an injustice.” The report cites the then-existing federal law which provided that the Commissioner-General of Immigration was responsible for “the support and relief of such aliens as may fall into distress or need public aid.”

The report criticized the low reimbursement rates paid by the federal government and the process by which the payments were calculated. Payments were made only for cases in which deportation warrants were issued, which occurred after the individual was housed in the city hospitals while Immigration doctors determined whether they should be deported so they wouldn’t become a public charge, which triggered deportation.

Report, page 4. Office of the Mayor (Kline) Collection, NYC Municipal Archives.

“The city is not reimbursed for expenses incurred for the care and treatment of these patients at the hospitals during the investigation, which often consumes several weeks before the issue of the warrant. If the investigation fails to develop facts sufficient to warrant deportation the city receives nothing for care and treatment during the period of detention.” Between 1902 and December 1913, the City was reimbursed only $1,149—far less than the Commissioners of Accounts calculated was fairly due.

The report recommended that the Trustees of the Bellevue and Allied Hospitals begin negotiations with federal authority “with a view to relieving the City of New York of the unjust share of this federal burden which it bears at the present time…”

It’s not clear that City officials acted on this recommendation. There are no letters in the Mayor Kline collection to the federal government requesting full reimbursement. It is clear, though, that the City took on the responsibility of caring for immigrants in poor health, even if not fully compensated.

The United Nations in New York City

This week, the 78th Session of the United Nations General Assembly convened at the United Nations Headquarters in New York City. According to the official United Nations website, “World leaders gather to engage in the annual high-level General Debate under the theme, ‘Rebuilding trust and reigniting global solidarity: Accelerating action on the 2030 Agenda and its Sustainable Development Goals towards peace, prosperity, progress and sustainability for all’.” 

For the Record looks at the many resources in Municipal Archives and Library collections for researchers interested in documenting the history of the United Nations in New York City.   

United Nations, aerial view, ca. 1962, transparency. Department of Ports and Trade photograph collection. NYC Municipal Archives.

The basic structure of the United Nations as agreed to in 1944 at the Dumbarton Oaks Conference did not specify New York City as headquarters for the new peace-keeping organization. The records of the LaGuardia and O’Dwyer mayoral administrations provide ample documentation of the headquarters competition that New York City eventually won in 1946. For example, on September 24, 1945, Mayor LaGuardia received a letter from John E. Mack, Chairman of the Poughkeepsie Chamber of Commerce, urging the Mayor to support the selection of Hyde Park, New York, for the honor. Mack wrote: “It is our belief that Hyde Park has a strong international appeal. President Franklin D. Roosevelt was born here; he lived his lifetime there and is buried there... the proposed site for the United Nations government would center around the Roosevelt home and burial place, in close proximity to the Franklin D. Roosevelt Library.” LaGuardia immediately replied: “I agree with everything you say... except I am trying to have the headquarters of the United Nations... here in New York City.”  

The competition continued into Mayor William O’Dwyer’s administration. On December 29, 1945, Bronx Borough President James J. Lyons wrote to the Mayor-elect: “Do not let the ‘Oberburgomeiser’ [Robert Moses] sell you in the idea that the Corona Dumps are the only place for the home of the United Nations. Bob has a good batting average, but he frequently strikes out... He proceeds on the main theory that if it is not the ‘Moses Plan’ it is wrong. He has certainly given you a read dud on the Corona Dumps.” 

United Nations Contract 161c, looking north from U.N. roof, April 12, 1950. Borough President Manhattan photograph collection. NYC Municipal Archives.

Finally, in 1946, John D. Rockefeller, Jr. contributed $8.5 million to purchase a six-block tract of land on the East River in Manhattan which he donated as the site for the United Nations. The City contributed additional land and spent $23 million for improvements and reconstruction around the site, and the deal was finalized.      

Cancellation of first United Nations stamp. L to R., Postmaster Albert Goldman, Eleanor Roosevelt, John Golden, Elizabeth Impellitteri, October 5, 1950. Grover Whalen records collection. NYC Municipal Archives.

Invitation to Laying of Cornerstone for the Permanent Headquarters of the United Nations, Luncheon at Gracie Mansion, October 24, 1949. Grover Whalen records collection. NYC Municipal Archives.

Researchers will find numerous folders labeled “United Nations” within the subject files of each succeeding Mayor. Much of the more recent correspondence focuses on costs incurred by the City in protecting United Nations personnel. For example, in February 1971, William B. Macomber, Jr., the Deputy Under Secretary of State for Administration in Washington, D.C., wrote to Mayor Lindsay: “As a result of the Administration’s review,... we are prepared to forward proposed legislation to the Congress which would authorize an appropriation in the amount of $1.3 million for payment to the City of New York in defraying the extraordinary expenses it incurred in affording protection to visiting chiefs of state and heads of government during the 25th United Nations General Assembly.” Lindsay replied that he hoped the legislation would support reimbursement for the full $2.6 in security expenditures. The result of this legislative action was not evident in the file, but similar correspondence can be found in later mayoral records.       

Invitation envelope, 1949, Grover Whalen records collection. NYC Municipal Archives.

The Library’s holdings of printed materials include several pertinent titles. The March 1947 Report on Foundation Investigation, by Moran, Proctor, Freeman & Museser, provides a detailed history of the site, dating back to the colonial era. More recent relevant content such as the United Nations Impact Report, 2016, can be found in the Government Publications Portal, hosted by the Library. The report is full of informative facts: e.g. “Overall, the UN Community contributed an estimated $69 billion in total output to New York City in 2014; approximately 25,040 full-and part-time jobs in New York City are attributable to the UN Community.”  

Researchers interested in how New York City organized and participated in the many ceremonial aspects of the United Nations will find the Mayor’s Reception Committee files a rich resource, particularly for the early years under the leadership of official city-greeter, Grover Whalen. In the 1960s, the Mayor’s Office established a dedicated office, Commissioner to the United Nations, that evolved into the New York City Commission for the United Nations, Consular Corps & Protocol. The  Municipal Archives collections include several accessions from the various mayoral United Nations-related offices.   

Researchers are encouraged to search in the Collection Guide for further details on available materials, including significant quantities of audio and video materials related to the United Nations and its home in New York City for more than three-quarters of a century.   

United Nations, ca.. 1985. New York City Convention and Visitors Bureau, NYC Municipal Archives.

Loew’s Canal Street Theater

For the Record has followed progress of the Manhattan Building Plans processing and rehousing project in several articles, most recently, Manhattan Building Plans Project - The Seaport and Financial District. This week, For the Record highlights the original plans for the Loew’s Canal Street Theatre identified by project archivists. 

31 Canal Street, Loew’s Canal Street Theater, 1940. Showing were the 1940 films Abe Lincoln in Illinois, a black & white bio-pic, and a Shirley Temple Technicolor fantasy The Blue Bird. Both films were box-office flops. Also showing was the racy 1940 crime drama Convicted Woman, and a 1939 comedy, Money to Burn. 1940s Tax Photograph Collection.

The Loew’s Canal Street Theatre is located between Essex and Ludlow Streets, in the heart of Manhattan’s Lower East Side. Long since converted to other uses, the building is a surviving example of the lavish movie palaces built by the Loew’s company in the 1920s and 30s throughout the city. 

1934 Manhattan Atlas, showing block 297. Although the Theater auditorium fronted Ludlow Street, the narrow marquee entrance lobby was on Canal Street.

Designed by noted theater architect Thomas W. Lamb, it featured an elegant interior and a beautifully ornamented terra-cotta exterior. Although not as fantastical as the five “Wonder Theaters” built by Loew’s in the late 1920s, it does share many of the features Lamb used in his design for one of the Wonders, the 175th Street Theatre in upper Manhattan. The 175th Street venue retained its extravagant interior and has been featured in recent news stories as the site of the Tony Award ceremony this past June. 

Front Elevation, Vestibules and Lobby Details [Design], Loew’s Theater, Canal & Ludlow Streets. Thomas W. Lamb Architect, 1927. Department of Buildings collection.

Longitudinal Section [Design], Loew’s Theater, Canal & Ludlow Streets. Thomas W. Lamb Architect, 1927. Department of Buildings collection.

Half Cross Sections [Design], Loew’s Theater, Canal & Ludlow Streets. Thomas W. Lamb Architect, 1927. Department of Buildings collection.

Ceiling and Balcony Soffit, Loew’s Theater, Canal & Ludlow Streets. Thomas W. Lamb Architect, 1927. Department of Buildings collection.

The Landmarks Preservation Commission designated the Loew’s Canal Street Theatre in 2010. The report narrative places the building within the context of the golden age of movie palaces. It describes how Loew’s Inc. founder Marcus Loew, born on the Lower East Side in 1870, started his entertainment company with vaudeville theaters and nickelodeons. He bought Metro Pictures in 1924 and merged it with Goldwyn Pictures and Louis B. Mayer Pictures to form Metro-Goldwyn-Meyer (MGM), a Hollywood studio that dominated the film industry for decades.  

27-29 Canal Street, showing Loew’s Canal Street Theater marquee and sign. 1940s Tax Photograph Collection.

The building plans recently identified by municipal archivists depict the external features of the building described in the Landmarks report: “The ground floor consists almost entirely of a large rectangular opening that was once fitted with a series of doors flanking a central box office. The upper floors are completely clad in terra cotta with projecting piers running along the full height of the building’s corners. The blind openings on the second story, which are fitted with rare black terra cotta designed to mimic windowpanes, hide the mechanical equipment of what was originally the theater’s fan room. The most flamboyant ornamentation—which particularly distinguishes the Canal Street Theatre from earlier designs produced by Lamb’s firm—is reserved for the cornice line. Griffons, eagles, and fanciful sea monsters are interspersed with garlands, festoons, and other foliate motifs in an exuberant explosion of terra-cotta decoration.” The complete designation report  is available from the Publications Portal in the Municipal Library. 

In addition to the building plans, Municipal Archives collections also include the related Department of Buildings permit application file. The folder for the Loew’s Theatre (Block 297, Lot 1) contains New Building Application No. 404 of 1926, filed on August 23, 1926, signed by architect Thomas Lamb. The application specifications recorded the building would have a seating capacity of 2,324. 

New Building Application, front, 1927. Department of Buildings collection.

New Building Application, reverse, 1927. Department of Buildings collection.

There are no other applications in the folder for modifications to the building except an Alteration Application filed in November 1962. In the section asking the applicant to “State generally in what manner the Building will be altered,” owner Sidney Silberman wrote: “This building will no longer be used as a theatre. All seats have been removed. It is proposed to use the 1st floor spaces between aisles only, for storage of hardware. Part of 1st floor is now to be divided for Retail Store and Manufacturing. The marquise on Canal St. Side of building is to be removed.” The Landmarks report added to this sad ending by noting that the original entrance doors and frames have been removed and replaced with “an infill storefront covered by metal roll-down security gates.”  

Alteration Application, page 1, 1962. Department of Buildings collection.

Alteration Application, page 2, 1962. Department of Buildings collection.

31 Canal Street, ca. 1985. 1980s Tax Photograph collection.

Project archivists have processed other works by architect Thomas Lamb. In addition to the Loew’s Canal Theatre, his Loew’s State Theatre at 1538 Seventh Avenue, the Strand Theatre at 231 W. 47th Street (both demolished), and the Julian Eltinge Theatre at 236 W. 42nd Street (now an AMC movie theater, originally a burlesque theater) are available. Other buildings designed by Lamb in the collection are located at 421 W. Broadway, 101 Prince Street (U.S. Post Office), 78-80 Walker Street and 92-94 Walker Street. Plans for buildings he designed as the partnership, Shreve, Lamb & Harmon, are the Bankers Trust Building at 14 Wall Street, the Insurance Company of North America at 99 John Street, the Western Electric Building at 222 Broadway, and the Vladeck Houses. 

As noted above, the building received landmark status in 2010. Later that year, the Lower Manhattan Development Corporation awarded $150,000 for a feasibility study to convert the space into a performance arts center. Ultimately, the project never came to fruition. The current status of the interior space is not known, but the original terra-cotta ornament around the Canal Street entrance is largely intact, hinting at the grandeur within. Perhaps the drawings in the collection will one day serve for a well-deserved restoration.    

Community Gardens

At summer’s end, New Yorkers lucky enough to have a plot in a community garden are enjoying the fruits (and vegetables) of their labor. This week, For the Record examines the Municipal Library’s vertical files to tell the story of community gardens. And it’s a classic New York tale, with neighborhood characters, celebrities, villains and heroes.  

Historians trace the first community garden back to the city’s Almshouse in the 1730s. The “inmates” (as they were called) worked in communal gardens, both for therapeutic reasons and to offset the cost of their maintenance in the institution. Nineteenth and early twentieth-century gardens were generally informal arrangements. For the Record’s article on Victory Gardens described the World War II-era plots that sprang-up around the city.  

The Municipal Library’s articles, brochures, press releases and ephemera in the vertical file on “NYC Gardens” picks up the story in the 1960s and 70s when arson and disinvestment in housing stock led to the proliferation of vacant lots. The lots attracted rats, became dumping grounds for garbage and venues for illegal activities. As a way of improving their blighted neighborhoods, community groups began advocating for permission to build gardens in the lots.  

Miracle Garden Bond & Wyckoff Streets, May 3, 1960. Department of Sanitation collection, NYC Municipal Archives.

Clipped articles in the file with headlines such as “1,000 ‘Farms’ Planned on Lots in New York,” describe these efforts: “Garbage-littered lots, many of them in the most rundown sections of New York City, will become vegetable gardens under a program to green the city by creating a thousand farms in low-income neighborhoods.” The story goes on to describe a Cornell University-sponsored program that supplied expertise, soil, tools and fertilizer to neighborhood groups.(New York Times, April 26, 1977.)  

Operation Green Thumb, November 1979. NYC Municipal Library Vertical File, NYC Gardens.

Community gardens gained momentum in 1978 with establishment of Operation GreenThumb, a community gardening program originally sponsored by the City’s Department of General Services, (and celebrating its 45th anniversary this year). According to an undated “Fact Sheet” in the vertical file, GreenThumb leased vacant property to non-profit organizations which established community vegetable and flower gardens. GreenThumb’s staff provided training and issued tools, soil, seeds and bulbs. By the 1990s, according to the Fact Sheet, GreenThumb leased more than 1,000 lots comprising 125 acres to 700 community groups and planted 2,000 apple, peach, plum and cherry trees. 

Another item in the file, a clipping from the “Daily Planet,” (Department of Parks and Recreation Newsletter), dated September 10, 1986, describes a community garden dedication ceremony: “Yesterday, at the end of a beautiful, late summer day, a hundred friends of green spaces in the city gathered to dedicate the Liz Christy Bowery Houston Garden on the Lower East Side. The ceremony, hosted by the Green Guerillas and the Council on the Environment of New York City, who jointly operate the garden, honored the memory of the woman who was the founder of New York’s open space greening movement.”  

The rosy picture painted in the Daily Planet and the impressive facts and figures in the Fact Sheet failed to acknowledge the clouds gathering over the City’s sunny gardens that began to develop during the 1980s and 90s. With the city recovering from the fiscal crisis of the 1970s, the demand for low-income housing began to ramp-up. Clipped articles in the files with headlines such as “Gardens face uprooting” are typical: “Community gardeners in Manhattan and the Bronx are fighting to keep their land. They are trying to keep their gardens alive after years of pruning, planting, and cultivating, despite a city plan to demolish hundreds of them to build new housing or businesses.” (New York Daily News, November 2, 1997.) 

N.Y. Water Saver’s Guide to Gardening. Mayor’s Commission on Water Conservation, 1988. NYC Municipal Library Vertical File, NYC Gardens.

Thanks to the diligent librarians, the vertical file includes several news clippings from the 1980s that tell the saga of Adam Purple and his Garden of Eden. In 1982, the Daily News described Mr. Purple as a “... middle-aged, bearded modern-day flower child,” (February 25, 1982). Other stories added that he typically wore a “purplish, pajama-like suit and purple hair.” The city decided it wanted Purple’s garden to build 189 units of low-income housing on the garden he had nurtured for thirteen years. The dispute wound up in court. In 1985 a federal judge ruled against Purple, and his garden was bulldozed.

During the Rudolf Giuliani administration (1994-2001), with the city even more desperate for housing, fights about the gardens escalated. “Herbicidal Maniac Loose in City! Guiliani Moves to Uproot Gardens,” read a headline in the May 1998 Metropolitan Council on Housing newsletter. “Folks Seeing Red Over Losing Green,” was the banner headline in Newsday: “...the city wants to auction 75 of these community-tended vegetable and flower gardens to the highest bidders. It’s the city’s version of a garage sale, and Mayor Rudy Giuliani has little sympathy for the people who have transformed junkyard lots and eyesores into gardens and community meeting places.” (Newsday, January 19, 1999)  

Green Guerillas, Winter 1999. NYC Municipal Library Vertical File, NYC Gardens.

But salvation came at the last minute, literally one day before the auction. “Sudden Deal Saves Gardens Set for Auction,” read the New York Times article on May 13, 1999. “A day before the Giuliani administration was to auction off city-owned lots that had been transformed into community gardens, the performer Bette Midler had her private conservation organization [The New York Restoration Project] agree to buy dozens of the less desirable parcels, providing the final funding to preserve all 112 gardens that were set for sale.”  

The last folder in the community garden vertical file contains articles from the early 2000s. During the Michael Bloomberg administration (2002-2013), the city adopted a more conciliatory posture with regard to the gardens, working toward balancing the need for additional housing against the popular green spaces. In 2002, the Times reported that “... the Bloomberg administration and Mr. Spitzer [New York State Attorney General] have begun negotiations that both sides hope will result in some gardens reverting to the city for development of low-income housing, and some going to community. Mr. Bloomberg has said recently that he believes that community gardens are viable in some situations, but that housing is preferable in others.”  (New York Times, April 26, 2002.) 

GreenThumb Fall 2023 Program Guide, NYC Parks Department.

With the advent of digitized media, the librarians mostly discontinued adding to the vertical files after the early 2000s. Although the contents of the community garden vertical file ends in early 2002, the Municipal Library’s publications portal picks up the story. One of the more recent documents is a press release, dated September 25, 2013, jointly issued by the Department of Environmental Protection, and the New York Restoration Project (NYRP). The release announced that the NYRP had “. . . recently completed the renovation of its Gil Hodges Community Garden in Brooklyn’s Gowanus Canal neighborhood. . . . with high-performance storm water infrastructure.”  

For the Record articles have frequently highlighted the vertical files. The cabinets contain articles clipped by the librarians from newspapers and magazines, as well as other printed items such as pamphlets, brochures and press releases on topics relevant to New York City government and history. They are arranged by subject and generally date from the 1920s with the bulk gathered between 1950 and the early 2000s

Although eclectic, they are a very valuable resource; much of the content is not available anywhere else; has not been digitized, and is unlikely to be.    

Researchers in the Municipal Library and Archives can ask the reference staff for the list of extant vertical files and in most instances, the requested materials can be produced right away.

The First Labor Day, September 5, 1882

Labor Day is observed on the first Monday in September. It serves to recognize the social and economic achievements of American workers. It has been a national holiday since 1894, but according to the U.S. Department of Labor, the first Labor Day holiday was celebrated in New York City, on September 5, 1882. 

Would the Municipal Library and Municipal Archives collections include documentation to support this statement? Regular readers of For the Record will know the answer. This week’s article describes how to explore Library and Archives collections to discover relevant records.  

Proceedings of the Board of Aldermen, vol. CLXVII, 1882. Municipal Library

As a first step, researchers are encouraged to consult the Municipal Archives’ online Collection Guides. Entering “Labor Day” into the search box yields 76 entries, most citing recent mayoral collections in which “Labor Day” is a subject heading. Several entries point to digitized New York Police Department Special Investigations Unit surveillance films of The 1968 Labor Day Parade highlighted in For the Record.

However, based on the “Labor Day” search, none of the entries target nineteenth-century records. What collections are there to research 1880s New York City? There are many, of course—Almshouse records, Building Department files and plans, tax assessment ledgers, Old Town ledgers, several criminal court and district attorney series, but two with the most potential for the Labor Day research are records of the legislative branch, and the mayor’s collections.

The Municipal Archives’ holdings of legislative collections date to the early 1600s and extend into the 21st century. The Archives recently applied to the National Endowment for the Humanities (NEH) to fund a project that would improve intellectual control over this large quantity of material (estimated at more than 10,000 cubic feet) and to plan processing and reformatting. The types of material that can be found within these series are very diverse. There are petitions, accounts, letters, rough minutes, remonstrances, communications, proclamations, maps, proposals, invitations, and reports of all kinds from city residents, as well as public agencies and private businesses and institutions.  

Proceedings of the Board of Aldermen, vol. CLXVII, 1882. Municipal Library

The several series within the greater collections created by the legislative bodies are accessible for research, but pending improved description and arrangement activities, locating relevant materials may sometimes require a more creative approach. The 1882 Labor Day document quest places the search in the records of the Board of Aldermen, as the legislative body was known at that time. One way to identify possible documents in this collection is to check the printed proceedings, or minutes, of the various legislative bodies. For the earliest time period, the printed Proceedings of the Common Council (in two sets, 1674-1776, and 1784-1832) include meticulous cumulative indexes. This greatly facilitates research in the associated collections. After 1832, each volume of the Proceedings, which generally covers several months, is indexed. The printed and published Proceedings are located in the Municipal Library. 

Proceedings of the Board of Aldermen, vol. CLXVII, 1882. Municipal Library

Based on the 1882 time frame for the Labor Day research, vol. CLXVII of the Proceedings, from July 3 to September 26, 1882, was a good place to start. The index under “L.” reveals an intriguing entry: “Labor and Trades-Union Association, preamble and resolution to tender sympathy to workingmen in their movement for independence from monopolies,” page 319. Turning to page 319, there is the text of a Resolution submitted by Ferdinand Alderman Levy. It starts, “Whereas, This day has been selected by the various Labor and Trades-Union Associations in this city as a day of demonstration of their strength, and a chosen opportunity to express their feelings upon the labor question in an orderly and the most forcible manner. . .” etc.

Is there more? With knowledge of that Resolution, the next step is the original papers of the Board of Aldermen in the Municipal Archives. Although the records have not been processed, they are generally arranged chronologically into folders pertaining to standing and special committees. The 1882 document boxes included a folder labeled “Resolutions.” And again, success—the original handwritten “Resolution of sympathy on behalf of the workingmen, by Alderman Levy, Board of Aldermen, September 5, 1882.” The reverse of the document is a handwritten draft of the resolution. It is unclear who wrote and edited the draft—likely Alderman Levy, but the edits show the evolution of the Board’s sentiment in the matter. For example, in the first paragraph, “and Trades Unions” is added to the first sentence, and in the second paragraph, the words laboring man, and Central Labor Union are crossed-out and replaced by workingmen. The paragraph concludes, “. . .  heartfelt and earnest sympathy in their movement for independence and freedom from Corporate monopolies and their power influences.”

Board of Aldermen, Approved Papers, 1882. NYC Municipal Archives.

Board of Aldermen, Approved Papers, 1882. NYC Municipal Archives.

The Early Mayors’ records are the other significant resource for researching 19th century New York City. The collection includes mayoral correspondence and documents from 1826 through 1897, and totals 157.5 cubic feet. Originally assembled by Rebecca Rankin during her 32-year tenure as the Director of the Municipal Library between 1920 and 1952, the Early Mayors’ records became a core collection in the Municipal Archives when it opened in 1952 and remains one of the most important series documenting nineteenth-century government and policies.

The 1882 date places the Labor Day research in the administration of William R. Grace (he served two non-consecutive terms; 1881-1882, and 1885-1886). Returning to the Collection Guide, and searching the Early Mayors Records collection and clicking on “External Documents” pulls up the Finding Aid for Mayor Grace’s subject files and at least one possibility in box 96, folder 2, labeled “Board of Aldermen.” And again, success in the folder—one item, similar to the Board of Aldermen document—a handwritten “Resolution requesting the Mayor and the Commissioners of Public Parks to grant permission to the Workingmens Central Labor Union to hold a mass meeting in and around Union Square. Submitted by Alderman Levy.” The reverse repeats the request and adds the date for the requested event—the evening of Wednesday, the 5th of September. A further notation states “Adopted, a majority of all the members elected voting in favor thereof. Signed F.J. Twomey, Clerk.”  Further examination of the document shows that the resolution had been proposed on July 3, 1882, with the final version fixing September 5 as the day requested for the Union Square demonstration.

Mayor William R. Grace Collection, 1882. NYC Municipal Archives.

Mayor William R. Grace Collection, 1882. NYC Municipal Archives.

Based on this evidence, it seems clear that the U.S. Department of Labor’s statement is accurate. Whether it was based on research in Municipal Archives and Library collections is not known, but we can add that these collections would likely provide additional material to research the bigger picture—what was happening with the labor movement in the City during this period that triggered the designation of the special day.

In the meantime, For the Record wishes everyone an enjoyable day honoring the American worker—first celebrated in New York City, 141 years ago.

Women’s Equality Day 2023: Embrace Equity

“After I decided to write this tribute, I was beset with feeling inadequate to the task of expressing what Ketriana has meant to so many people, including me. What adjectives are adequate to describe the full range of Ketriana’s multi-talented, multi-faceted lived experience that has uplifted the lives of her friends, neighbors, colleagues and co-workers, even acquaintances. She approaches and interacts with all folks with a generous, compassionate, and caring spirit that says I salute and encourage the best in you.”

Thus begins the tribute Charles Yates has written to his friend Ketriana Yvonne on WomensActivism.NYC, a moving dedication that captures Ketriana’s energy and creativity—from her challenge for him to write a poem each day of National Poetry Month to her own artistic work. Ketriana’s story is part of an initiative to write women into history by sharing stories of everyday, extraordinary women launched by the NYC Department of Records & Information Services (DORIS) on Women’s Equality Day on August 26, 2015.

WomensActivism.NYC is a public, searchable site showcasing brief descriptions of inspiring women from around the world. Entries include women—both well-known and not—with roles as diverse as sisters, great-grandmothers, celebrities, next-door neighbors, elected officials, teachers, professional athletes, artists, and more. Diverse representation is important, and the only requirements are: 1) they must be woman-identified, and 2) they must have contributed to making change in some way.

With more than 9,000 stories already archived, DORIS is currently soliciting 700 more stories to complete the project with 10,000 stories of inspiring and empowering women. This collection will be preserved and made available in perpetuity through the Municipal Archives, where the stories will be freely and readily accessible for all.

———————

“On May 2, 1963, nine-year old Audrey Faye Hendricks became the youngest known person arrested during the Civil Rights Movement. She was one of hundreds of children who took part in marches against segregation in the city of Birmingham, Alabama.”

Preston F. on Audrey Hendricks 

———————

Women’s Equality Day

Born Bella Savitsky on July 24, 1920, in New York City, Bella Abzug was a leading liberal activist and politician in the 1960s and 1970s who became especially well-known for her work for women’s rights. To promote women’s issues and to lobby for reform, she helped establish the National Women’s Political Caucus (NWPC) with Betty Friedan, Shirley Chisholm, and Gloria Steinem. To have an even greater impact on the political process, she served in the House of Representatives from 1971 to 1977.

At the behest of Representative Bella Abzug (D-NY), in 1971, the U.S. Congress designated August 26 as Women’s Equality Day in 1973. This date was selected to commemorate the 1920 certification of the 19th Amendment to the Constitution—a key piece of legislation granting women the right to vote. This was the culmination of the Women’s Suffrage Movement, a massive, peaceful civil rights movement by women that had its formal beginnings in 1848 at the world’s first women’s rights convention in Seneca Falls, New York.

The annual observance of Women’s Equality Day on August 26 not only commemorates the passage of the 19th Amendment, but also calls attention to women’s continuing efforts toward full equality in our society. Many workplaces, libraries, organizations and public institutions now participate in Women’s Equality Day with programs, displays, or other activities, all with the intention of bringing awareness and attention to the important matter of gender equity. For 2023, the theme of Women’s Equality Day is “Embrace Equity,” a global recognition of the ongoing struggle for equal rights and opportunities for women of all backgrounds.

———————

“On May 28, 1969, NY City Mayor John V. Lindsay appointed Dr. Mary McLaughlin as Commissioner of the Department of Health. She was the second woman to hold the post. Under McLaughlin’s leadership, the Health Department launched initiatives that addressed narcotics addiction, mental health, and lead poisoning.”

———————

Women’s Equality Week

Rep. Bella Abzug (D-NY), who had applied to Harvard Law School but was rejected because of her gender, graciously accepts a copy of the mayoral proclamation. Bella Abzug with Mayor Edward I. Koch, City Hall, August 20, 1980. Mayor Edward I. Koch photograph collection, NYC Municipal Archives.

On August 20, 1980, Mayor Edward Koch issued a proclamation declaring the week of August 20–26, 1980, as “Women’s Equality Week” in New York City, “in order to emphasize the importance of full rights and opportunities for women in our society.”

The proclamation went on to recall the struggles the recognized leaders of the Women’s Suffrage Movement had endured mere decades earlier in their struggles to bring about women’s rights for future generations:

THE MILESTONES IN WOMEN’S STRUGGLE TO ACHIEVE EQUALITY ARE MANIFOLD.

THE FIRST SIGNIFICANT EVENT OCCURRED IN SENECA FALLS, NEW YORK, IN 1848, WHEN LUCRETIA MOTT AND ELIZABETH CADY STANTON LED THE FIRST WOMEN’S RIGHTS CONVENTION.

THIS WAS FOLLOWED BY SUSAN B. ANTHONY BEING CONVICTED FOR VOTING ILLEGALLY; HARRIET TUBMAN, BORN A SLAVE, LEADING 300 SLAVES TO FREEDOM; AND MARGARET SANGER ESTABLISHING THE FIRST CLINIC FOR CONSULTATION ON BIRTH CONTROL, TO NAME BUT A FEW.

IT IS FITTING THAT WE RECALL THESE TURNING POINTS IN THE HISTORY OF THE WOMEN’S MOVEMENT, AND THAT TODAY, IN 1980, WE CELEBRATE THE 60TH ANNIVERARY OF SUFFRAGE, RECOGNIZING ANEW THAT ALL MEN AND WOMEN ARE EQUAL BEFORE THE LAW.

———————

“As you lose your memory, your words, and yourself, I want you to know that I still see you. I still see the strong woman who didn’t have a choice but to be strong in a country that was brutal and unforgiving. I see the woman who managed to provide opportunities to her own daughters that she didn’t have as a young, immigrant, black woman in either her country of birth or choice.”

Dr. Christiana Best on her mother, Pearl Mavis Munro 

———————

Women’s Rights in 2023

Catherine Harry is a Cambodian influencer. She founded a vlog channel called A Dose of Cath and uses it as a platform to discuss topics that are usually not talked about enough in Cambodia because they are often deemed taboo. The topics she tackles include safe sex, masturbation, rape, abortion, divorce, etcetera. Harry aims to empower women.” 

Since the creation of Women’s Equality Day in 1973 and Mayor Koch’s proclamation of Women’s Equality Week in 1980, efforts have continued toward realizing women’s full equality and recognition in our society. Women such as Catherine Harry are giving voice to subjects not previously acknowledged, while raising conversations around women’s needs and gender equity for all.

One part of bringing about gender equity is publicly recognizing the hard work, contributions, and accomplishments that women have made and continue to make toward improving society. Celebrate the women you know who are making positive change by joining the thousands of people who have contributed stories to WomensActivism.NYC. From historic figures who were left out of yesterday’s history books to today’s family and neighborhood role models, we all know women who deserve to be written about and remembered for generations to come. They are exceptional, everyday, extraordinary, important, and they matter to us.

As Charles concludes in his dedication to Ketriana, “Yes, truly inspirational.”